Charles Daly
10-27-2008, 01:29 AM
rob_s has converted his famous M4 Chart into a spreadsheet and loaded it onto Google Docs. It now has an "Explanation of Features", the "Specs" of the models and an easy to read "Comparison" of the models. You can view it in its entirety here: M4 Chart by Rob_s (http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pwswheghNQsEuEhjFwPrgTA&hl=en)
We have a thread in this forum with a version of the Chart posted as it existed in August of this year. You can see it by clicking on this link (http://www.charlesdalyforum.com/showthread.php?t=178). One of the problems with the chart was that many people would see an old version of it and complain that it was outdated. It appears that Rob has addressed those complaints by posting a spreadsheet that can be easily updated.
You can also get more detailed information on the specs in The Chart, and see the lengthy discussion that follows on M4Carbine.net by clicking here (http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=6642).
Why do I post this again? We want our Forum Members and Guests to see how our D-M4LE "stacks up" against the other civilian M4's on the market. We only entered the AR market in April of this year and we are quite proud of what we have been able to accomplish in such a short time.
The Chart shows that as far as the specifications go, we are right up there with Colt, Noveske and LMT. Of course, specs alone do not tell the whole story of an AR's quality, but it does show that we have built them right. Several T&E's are on many websites that speak more specifically about the accuracy, dependability and reliability of our AR's, so the consumer can see that the CDD-15 is put together right and it runs and runs and runs.
The Chart will also show that we have room to improve and we are working on achieving improvement where we can. I readily acknowledge that. However, right now, I feel we can claim that our CDD-15 carbines and rifles, and specifically our D-M4LE, is the best value on the market for a mil-spec quality M4.
Kudos to rob_s for his dedication to the Chart project. His work is a "labor of love" and it shows. Check it out. I'm sure you will agree.
We have a thread in this forum with a version of the Chart posted as it existed in August of this year. You can see it by clicking on this link (http://www.charlesdalyforum.com/showthread.php?t=178). One of the problems with the chart was that many people would see an old version of it and complain that it was outdated. It appears that Rob has addressed those complaints by posting a spreadsheet that can be easily updated.
You can also get more detailed information on the specs in The Chart, and see the lengthy discussion that follows on M4Carbine.net by clicking here (http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=6642).
Why do I post this again? We want our Forum Members and Guests to see how our D-M4LE "stacks up" against the other civilian M4's on the market. We only entered the AR market in April of this year and we are quite proud of what we have been able to accomplish in such a short time.
The Chart shows that as far as the specifications go, we are right up there with Colt, Noveske and LMT. Of course, specs alone do not tell the whole story of an AR's quality, but it does show that we have built them right. Several T&E's are on many websites that speak more specifically about the accuracy, dependability and reliability of our AR's, so the consumer can see that the CDD-15 is put together right and it runs and runs and runs.
The Chart will also show that we have room to improve and we are working on achieving improvement where we can. I readily acknowledge that. However, right now, I feel we can claim that our CDD-15 carbines and rifles, and specifically our D-M4LE, is the best value on the market for a mil-spec quality M4.
Kudos to rob_s for his dedication to the Chart project. His work is a "labor of love" and it shows. Check it out. I'm sure you will agree.